Sixth Bi-Monthly Monetary Policy Statement on February 2, 2016 by Governor Rajan: No surprises

But will the current stance of monetary accommodation be able to withstand a China shock?

 Monetary Policy                                                                                                     2015-16

Please read my blog of December 11, 2015.

The last monetary policy statement for 2015-16 contained no surprises: all key rates are on hold.

As I had indicated in my December blog a further easing in the repo rate could be expected only next financial year, if inflation follows the projected trajectory of the RBI – 5% by March 2017.

Loans based on the marginal cost of bank funds will come into effect from April 1, 2016.It will be interesting to see whether this induces banks to pass on more of the 1.25% reduction in the repo rate by the RBI.

Last month saw fresh turbulence in the financial markets, with China at the epicentre of it as its stock markets declined sharply, its currency depreciated, fx reserves fell by more than $ 100 billion, and importantly its regulators lost some credibility in managing markets. India’s economy withstood the turbulence fairly solidly. The SENSEX fell, the rupee weakened against the U.S. dollar but was stable against a basket of currencies, fx reserves fell marginally in January and have since risen, and some money market and bond market rates saw an upward tendency.

India’s superior performance relative to most other emerging markets over the last one year rests on both the government and the RBI taking positive policy and administrative measures. It will be interesting to see what positive surprises government unveils in its next budget due in less than two weeks.

The government is committed to fiscal consolidation, i.e. keeping government spending under control. There have been suggestions in some quarters that government perhaps should go a little easy on fiscal consolidation, and thereby give a boost to the economy to counterbalance the still weak private sector investment. The RBI’s desire as articulated in the monetary policy statement is clear: it prefers the government to undertake structural reforms rather than increase government spending that pushes back the country’s fiscal consolidation target.

China is a source of turbulence in the global economy. The economy has seen a hard landing - how else can one characterise an economy whose growth has halved from heady levels well in excess of 10%?   But a shock would be another matter.

A China shock could come from various sources: excessive debt, troubled banks, a sharp devaluation of the yuan.  This would be a stern test for the RBI’s current course of monetary easing as contagion takes effect. The RBI may then be forced to abandon its current monetary policy stance as it fights stress in multiple markets such as fx and money.

The value of the Rupee: update as of January 2016

Rupee remains relatively stable against a basket of currencies amidst global turbulence in January

RBI Watch                                                                                                 Indian Rupee

Please also read my blog of December 18, 2015.

The flow of money does not suggest that India’s economy will move to a significantly higher growth path soon

Money is a fuel that economic agents use to produce and deliver goods and services. So let’s look at the numbers to get a sense of the prospects of India’s growth in 2015-16 and the next year.

The tables below give the numbers for deposit mobilisation and credit disbursed by banks in the current financial year up to January 22, 2016. Both this financial year and over the last twelve months ending January 2016 there has been an increase in credit growth by 1 to 2%. Deposit growth has seen no change. 

A lag between credit creation and economic growth is to be expected as economic agents first build factories, make purchases of raw materials and then run the factories and deliver goods to consumers. This suggests there is likely to be a pick-up in India’s economy in 2016-17. But the pick-up is likely to be slow. During the years from 2004 to 2008 when the economy was growing in the 8-10% area, credit grew well in excess of 20% per year. Deposits during the same period grew close to 20%.

Let’s also look at two other foundations of money in the economy -money supply and reserve money? Reserve money consists of currency in circulation and the deposits of banks with the RBI. It is reserve money that the RBI can use to influence the growth of money supply. Money supply consists of currency in circulation, demand deposits (money in savings bank and current accounts) and time deposits (fixed deposits).

The tables below give the numbers.

The trend in the current financial year suggests barely any change in the growth of money supply –about 11%, roughly the same as last year. During India’s high growth years from 2004 to 2008 money supply grew by close to 20% per year.

The picture on reserve money is different – there has been a jump in growth: 12% over the last one year compared to 10% in the previous year. Does this suggest acceleration in money supply and credit in 2016-17? The potential is there but it is still early days to make a confident call.

In conclusion, the money flows during the current financial year upto January 22, 2016 does not suggest a sharp buoyancy in the economy. There is some pick up in credit, which could lead to slightly higher growth next year – we are, however, still far away from the boom years of 2004 to 2008.

Monitoring the NaMo Bull Market in Stocks: Update as of January 2016

The NaMo bull market in stocks is at a critical point

Indian Stock Market Watch

As of end January, 2016, TMV/GNP is estimated  at 68%. The last time market capitalisation of BSE as % of GNP fell below 70% was in April 2014, the month before Narendra Modi came to power. 

Since the end of the global financial crisis TMV/GNP ratio fell for about two years - from  September 2010 to August 2012. During this phase, the low for the ratio was 57.5%.

Please refer to my blog of July 9, 2014 for the original note on using TMV/GNP ratio to gauge whether the market is cheap or expensive.