Friday, 2 January 2015
Wednesday, 31 December 2014
Fifth, December 2 , 2014, Bi-Monthly Monetary Policy Statement by Governor Rajan: Is the RBI’s key interest rate high?
RBI Watch Monetary Policy 2014-15
Banks can reduce their lending rates without waiting for the RBI to reduce its repo rate
Banks can reduce their lending rates without waiting for the RBI to reduce its repo rate
Yesterday the Economic Times reported that the Finance
Minister pinned the blame for the slump in manufacturing on high interest rates.
The ET’s interpretation of this was that FM wanted the RBI to reduce its key
rate, the repo rate. Today, the ET reports that FM criticised reports that he
has differences with Governor Rajan on interest rates.
Whatever the full facts, there is clearly some truth in yesterday's report: the government would love to see bank lending rates lower, and if the
RBI could accomplish this by reducing its key repo rate so much the better.
The fact is that banks have sufficient liquidity, and they do not need the RBI to
lower its repo rate to reduce their lending rates. Note also banks have
greater capacity to lend now – remember the reduction in Statutory Liquidity
Ratio, the amount banks must compulsorily invest in government securities, by
RBI in its earlier policy statements this fiscal year. One could expect banks then
to lend more by reducing the lending rate. But this has not happened, perhaps
because banks want to increase their profit margins after some years of stress
on assets. Note, some banks have reduced deposit rates.
There is also another factor that could be playing on the
mind of banks: the expected hike in interest rates by the Federal Reserve next
year. The market’s expectation is that it will not happen before April next
year. A rise in interest rates in the USA will certainly put pressure on India:
a withdrawal of liquidity from India is possible but could be countered with
macro reform measures -the government is acting on this front with energy through
ordinances - and tactical micro market measures.
On the RBI’s part, as
I have said earlier, it wants to send a strong signal that
it wants to keep real interest rates positive at the 1.5 to 2% level on a
sustained basis. This is the new monetary policy paradigm
under Governor Rajan and his team. High inflation in India was supported by
negative real interest rates.
Inflation (CPI ) has trended down at a faster pace than the
RBI expected – for three months now it has
been below the 6% target set by the RBI for Jan 2016. The fact of the matter is
that weak demand in India has played a part in this. So has the exceptional
deflationary situation in the developed world, and even in China, where for 33
months there has been PPI deflation, and the latest CPI came in at 1.4%. And to top it all, we have a deflationary oil price shock!
The RBI expects, after the base effects wear to off in
another month or so, to see an uptick in inflation. Its estimate is that inflation
will be around the 6% level by January 2016. So, a repo rate of 8% - a real
rate of about 2% - is consistent with this scenario. My sense is that if the
uptick is less than what the RBI expects – I won’t be surprised if this happens
- then you will see a small reduction in the repo to 7.5%.
Just as in the case of banks, RBI is worried about the hike
in interest rates in the USA next year. Ideally
it would like to see through smoothly the first phase of the hike in fed funds
by the Federal Reserve before reducing the repo rate.
The bottom line is that the RBI, left it itself, is in no
hurry to reduce its repo rate. This makes good sense.
Finally, both the government and the RBI are by and large on the same page
when it comes to growth of the economy. The Government is looking at the immediate picture - shall we say just as
the CEO of a company is answerable for quarterly profits to shareholders - as well as the
long run. The RBI seems more focused on the long run.
This is what Rajan said on growth in his press conference
after the release of bimonthly monetary policy statement statement on December
2:
“On the first, I think there is a misconception in corporate
India that the central bank is not concerned about growth. It is a
misconception because the fundamental way to get sustainable growth in this
country, and we are not talking about growth this quarter, in fact, monetary
policy will not affect growth this quarter, it has long lags, it has been
established in India, 3-4 quarters down the line we will see the consequence. What again and again we have seen is in
India but outside India also the way to sustainable growth is to have moderate
inflation.”
Tuesday, 30 December 2014
Amazon's financials
S&P 500 Watch
Reference my blog of October 30 on Amazon titled " Amazon’s performance critical for investors and the tech industry ". I suggest the following articles on Amazon's financials:
Financial Times, December 1, 2014: Amazon falls on debt sale plan disclosure and
The Motley Fool, October 30, 2014 : What Investors Need to Know About Amazon.com Inc's Cash Flows.
Reference my blog of October 30 on Amazon titled " Amazon’s performance critical for investors and the tech industry ". I suggest the following articles on Amazon's financials:
Financial Times, December 1, 2014: Amazon falls on debt sale plan disclosure and
The Motley Fool, October 30, 2014 : What Investors Need to Know About Amazon.com Inc's Cash Flows.
Wednesday, 3 December 2014
Monday, 24 November 2014
Kotak Mahindra’s Bank acquisition of ING Vysya Bank: the difficult part comes now
Timely and effective integration
of ING Vysya staff and managers will be key to success
RBI Watch Banking Structure
India’s regulations do not allow for a hostile takeover of
one bank by another. Friendly takeovers are allowed, and this is done through
the board approved merger route. For those interested in the regulatory detail
(surprisingly easy to digest), please see this link.
In keeping with this, the boards of Kotak Mahindra Bank and
ING Vysya Bank announced their decision to merge – ING Vysya Bank will
amalgamate with Kotak Mahindra Bank in all stock deal. Here is an example of
two strong parties coming together with the potential to become even stronger.
Uday Kotak was under considerable pressure to reduce his
promoter stake in Kotak Bank by the RBI even as ING Group, especially after the
financial crisis of 2008, was keen to give up its promoter status at ING Vysya.
Kotak is considered a North and West based Bank, while ING Vysya is a South
based bank; Kotak has a stronger presence in retail, whereas ING Vysya has a
stronger presence in SME. So there is a congruence of promoter and business
interests. And the deal has come cheaper for Kotak than some recent deals.
It looks likely that getting the necessary regulatory
approvals will not be a major problem – either from the RBI or the Competition
Commission of India. This will take about a year.
To my mind, the real difficult part for Kotak Mahindra Bank
is after the acquisition: Kotak Mahindra Bank has a unique culture which
accounts hugely for its success, and can it get the ING Vysya staff and
managers to evolve into ‘’Kotakans’’.
Kotak Mahindra Bank’s culture is less about form and almost
totally about performance. It inculcates in its staff and managers to be fair,
encourages open debate on tough issues, rewards merit generously, gives young
staff greater responsibility than at other banks; yet expects it staff and
managers to follow the rules and regulations.
Kotak Bank managers work very long hours – to finish work at
8-00 pm appears to be routine. I remember recently meeting by chance a young
mother and her son on a train. When I asked her what her husband did she told
me he was a Kotak Mahindra bank manager of one of the tier 2 city branches. She
glowed with pride that her husband worked at Kotak Mahindra Bank, but she also
made it clear that her husband spent long hours at work.
ING Vysya’s culture is different. Sure it has had a very
experienced and progressive CEO during the last five years, who has built a
good bank. Yet ING Vysya comes with some of the trappings of an old private
sector bank. Its staff is more unionised, many come under the IBA wage structure,
and are likely to be older than Kotak Bank staff.
Then there is the issue of finding work for those of the ING
Vysya staff who in due course are found to be surplus. Kotak Mahindra Bank has
announced that efforts will be made to find suitable roles for them in the rest
of the Kotak Group.
Uday Kotak and his top team are aware of these challenges,
and I am sure will start working on these issues right away. Newspapers have
reported that Uday Sareen, the CEO designate at ING Vysya, will report directly
to Uday Kotak after the acquisition. Surely, his role will be to tell Uday Kotak
and his top team not just the nuts and
bolts of ING Vysya’s business, but of its culture – the formal, and more
importantly, the informal rules of getting things done at his former bank –employees,
and union. And when does his role start? I guess he needs to be also an Advisor
to Kotak Mahindra Bank during the next year or so when the regulatory approvals
will be in place. There have been reports
that Uday Sareen has already started meeting employees in town hall meetings.
Despite the challenges, I believe Kotak Mahindra Bank will
succeed in getting the ING Vysya staff and managers to become ‘’Kotakans’’.
Kotak Mahindra Bank will have its hands full over the next three years, and
there will be some ‘’icebergs’’ along the way that will require deft handling.
Uday Kotak is considered by many a financial wizard. His
real strength, to my mind, has been his soft skill: his ability to build a
solid team and organisation. Perhaps the New Year will see him addressing some
town hall meetings.
Thursday, 6 November 2014
The future of Google
Indian Stock Market Watch
S&P 500 Watch
A day after I wrote a blog titled "Amazon’s performance critical for investors and the tech industry", on October 30, FT published an interview with Larry Page, Co-Founder of Google, which to my mind is compulsory reading to investors and those interested in the future of the tech industry.
In my article, I had questioned Amazon's valuation, compared it with Google, and questioned the strategy of "visionaries at companies such as Google, Facebook (Amazon is an extreme example) pursuing long term profits but doing so through highly speculative, or shall I say forward looking, investments in fairly diverse industries".
Now FT reports that Larry Page is considering changing Google's mission statement: to "organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful" appears too restrictive for its ambitions and idealism.
FT reports that Steve Jobs told Larry Page "He would always tell me, You are doing too much stuff".
It is clear that for all the things that Google wants to do it needs a different kind of corporate structure, appropriate for both its investors and the conversions of these explorations into successful businesses/industries. FT reports that Larry Page admits that there is no model for the kind of company Google wants to become.
These are fascinating times indeed!
S&P 500 Watch
A day after I wrote a blog titled "Amazon’s performance critical for investors and the tech industry", on October 30, FT published an interview with Larry Page, Co-Founder of Google, which to my mind is compulsory reading to investors and those interested in the future of the tech industry.
In my article, I had questioned Amazon's valuation, compared it with Google, and questioned the strategy of "visionaries at companies such as Google, Facebook (Amazon is an extreme example) pursuing long term profits but doing so through highly speculative, or shall I say forward looking, investments in fairly diverse industries".
Now FT reports that Larry Page is considering changing Google's mission statement: to "organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful" appears too restrictive for its ambitions and idealism.
FT reports that Steve Jobs told Larry Page "He would always tell me, You are doing too much stuff".
It is clear that for all the things that Google wants to do it needs a different kind of corporate structure, appropriate for both its investors and the conversions of these explorations into successful businesses/industries. FT reports that Larry Page admits that there is no model for the kind of company Google wants to become.
These are fascinating times indeed!
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





